LLOBA new logo - September 2019

Exam appeals

Please read the following which provides some answers to frequently asked questions around the appeals process for this year’s summer grading provided by teacher assessed grades.

You can download an appeals form at the bottom.

How were my grades arrived at this year?

Grades this summer were based on Teacher Assessed Grades (TAGs). TAGs were submitted to the exam boards by us as a holistic assessment of a student’s performance in a subject, following a rigorous process of assessment, moderation and quality assurance.

These grades were then approved by the relevant exam board, following external quality assurance checks. This year no grades have been changed as a result of an algorithm.

We hope that students will be happy with their grades. These grades were based on assessments done in class time and for which students were prepared.

What do I do if I’m not happy with my grade?

All students have the opportunity to appeal their grade if they meet the eligibility criteria (see below). It is important to note that an appeal may result in a grade being lowered, staying the same, or going up. So, if a student puts in an appeal and their grade is lowered, they will receive the lower grade.

There is also the option to resit GCSEs, A levels and some AS levels in the autumn, which may be preferable to some students. The design, content and assessment of these papers will be the same as in a normal year.

What are the grounds for appeal?

There are four main grounds for appeal, as outlined by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ). They are:

  • You think we have made an administrative error: an example of this would be putting the wrong information into a spreadsheet.
  • You think we have made a procedural error: this means we haven’t properly followed our own process, as approved by the exam board. An example of this would be where you’ve been told you should have received extra time for assessments but this wasn’t given in a certain subject.
  • You think the academic judgement on the selection of evidence was unreasonable: you think the choice of evidence used to grade you was not reasonable.
  • You think the academic judgement on the grade you were given was unreasonable. What does ‘unreasonable’ mean? ‘Unreasonable’ is a technical term in this context and means that no educational professional acting reasonably could have selected the same evidence or come up with the same grade.
    This means that just because other forms of evidence may have been equally valid to use, the selection of evidence is not unreasonable. Because of the flexibility of the approach this year, every school and college will have used different forms of evidence. It also means that the independent reviewers will not remark or grade students’ evidence. Instead, they will look to see whether any teacher acting reasonably could have arrived at the same grade

What will be the outcome of an appeal?

At either stage of the appeals process (see ‘What are the two stages of an appeal?’ below), a student’s grade may go up, stay the same, or go down. When placing an appeal, the student will have to sign a declaration saying that they accept the fact their grade may go down and they may get a lower grade than their original grade.

What is a priority appeal?

Priority appeals will be handled more quickly than other appeals, where possible before UCAS’s advisory deadline of 8 September.

Priory appeals are only open to A level students starting university this autumn, who have missed out on the conditions of their firm or insurance offer.

If you decided not to confirm a firm conditional offer and to go through clearing instead, JCQ cannot offer you a priority appeal.

JCQ cannot offer priority appeals for GCSE students, unfortunately.

When making a priority appeal, students will have to include their UCAS number so it can be confirmed that it is a genuine priority appeal.

What should I do if I don’t get into my first choice of university?

First, don’t panic. Speak to Mrs Jordan about your options. You may wish to go through clearing or sit the autumn exams or summer exams next year to try to improve your grade.

If you are going to appeal your grade, you must let your university know you are appealing. They will then let you know whether they will hold a place for you pending the outcome of an appeal (note that universities are not obliged to hold a place for you; this is at their discretion).

What should I do before appealing?

You must read the JCQ Student and Parent Guide before appealing, which will be available on the JCQ website.
We may not be able to offer as much advice and guidance on the likely success of an appeal this summer as we would in past years, as we have already moderated and quality assured all the grades ourselves.

What are the two stages of an appeal?

All appeals, on any of the grounds above, must first go through a centre review. At this stage, we will check for any administrative errors, and check that our policies and procedures were followed correctly. Our policy has already been approved by the exam boards, so we are only ensuring that we followed this properly. This information is available on the school website.

The outcome of the centre review will be communicated to you when it has been completed.

At the centre review stage, if we find that a grade should go up or down, we will ask the exam board to change it. They will then consider this request.

Following the outcome of a centre review, you may still choose to pursue an awarding organisation appeal. You must fill in the form below, which we will then send on your behalf to the exam boards. Students and parents cannot send appeals directly to the exam board themselves – it must come from the school.

The outcome of the awarding organisation appeal will be communicated to you when it has been completed.

How do I make an appeal?

Whether your appeal is priority or not, following results days, you should fill in the first section of the JCQ form (link on the school website) and send it to appeals@lordlawson.academy. You will complete the second section only if your centre review does not change your grade and you would like to go to pursue an awarding organisation appeal.

What are the deadlines for priority appeals?

Our deadline for requesting a priority appeal is 12 August, 4pm. You cannot appeal before results day on 10 August.
We will attempt to complete the centre review by 16 August. If you wish to progress this to an awarding organisation appeal, you must send the completed form to us by 17 August for priority appeals.

What are the deadlines for non-priority appeals?

Non-priority appeals are any A levels, GCSEs or vocational qualifications, where a firm or insurance university place is not pending. Our deadline for submitting a centre review is 13 August, 4pm. Appeals received after these dates may still be considered.

You know my grades. Why can’t you tell us? What if you know we haven’t met our university conditional offer?

We are forbidden from disclosing the Teacher Assessed Grades to any third party, including students and parents, until results days. Any teacher or member of staff who does this is committing exam malpractice.

Although students may have been given marks or grades on single pieces of evidence, we cannot disclose the final submitted TAG.

During the external quality assurance process taking place in June or July, our submitted TAGs may be moved up or down (although this will always be done through human agency, not by an algorithm).

We only know what a student’s conditional offer is if they have chosen to share that information with us. It has not formed part of our objective grading of students. Where we do know this information, we must not let students know their submitted TAGs, even if they haven’t met the conditions of their offer.

Is there anything else I can do if I am still not happy with the decision made by the Awarding Organisation?

Following the conclusion of the awarding organisation’s appeal process, if you are still concerned your grade was incorrect you may be able to apply for a procedural review to the Exam Procedures Review Service.

Please use this form if you would like to make an appeal